In a quick break from the politics of the day, I have to take a moment to rant about Apple’s decision to eliminate a Firewire port from its new Macbooks and reduce to one, the number of Firewire ports on the Macbook Pro.
As you may have heard, Apple released newly designed Macbooks and Macbook Pros this week and they have eliminated all Firewire ports from the Macbook and left a single Firewire 800 port in the Macbook Pro. Every Mac since the advent of Firewire 1394a in 2000 has had at least one Firewire port. Hell, eMacs even came with two Firewire 400 ports.
According to an email that may or may not have come from Steve Jobs, Apple’s explanation for this nickle-and-dime elimination of the Firewire connection is because “all of the HD camcorders released in the last few years use USB 2.0.”
We get that you’re a visionary product guy, Steve. We understand that you can see the future and Firewire is nowhere in it according to you. However, in the real world present day us long time Apple fans have a shitload of Firewire products that need a way to get connected to our computers. We generally don’t toss out all of our existing electronic gizmos like hard drives, video cameras and iPods because Apple has decided it’s no longer appropriate for us to use.
And since the last time Steve had to deal with a technical problem on his computer was when he made Wozniak hack a problem with his Apple DOS boot loader floppy on his Apple II, he doesn’t see the inherent value of the brilliant, lifesaver Target Disk mode. I can tell you as someone who is constantly fixing people’s issues with their computers, it’s the Macbook users who need me to be able to mount their computer’s hard drive and deal with it… not Macbook Pro users. This feature is one that makes Macs better, different and more usable than your run-of-the-mill crap Dell laptop.
And all those folks who’d used and loved the earlier version of iMovie with their standard def video cameras (through Firewire), iMovie fans got the big F U from Apple when they completely dropped the familiar product (which I’m sure took people a long while to get comfortable with as they made awesome home movies of their kids) and replaced it with a completely new product lacking many of the features that made the tool so great.
Well, like it or not, Steve, Apple’s market share is growing and you’re extending your reach into the more common folks who are not as tech-savvy and not dripping with extra cash to replace their complete computer/video hardware portfolio every couple years. These folks go through a significant decision to spend $1,000+ on a Mac. Your decision is arrogant and puzzling, considering how little it would have cost to include a single Firewire port. And don’t you know that USB 2.0 is a crap standard?
Why is that? Here’s why (from Wikipedia):
Although high-speed USB 2.0 nominally runs at a higher signaling rate (480 Mbit/s) than FireWire 400, typical USB PC-hosts rarely exceed sustained transfers of 280 Mbit/s, with 240 Mbit/s being more typical. This is likely due to USB’s reliance on the host-processor to manage low-level USB protocol, whereas FireWire delegates the same tasks to the interface hardware. For example, the FireWire host interface supports memory-mapped devices, which allows high-level protocols to run without loading the host CPU with interrupts and buffer-copy operations.
FireWire 800 is substantially faster than Hi-Speed USB.
Hear that? USB 2.0 uses the processor of your computer to manage the protocol so it’s inherently slower. You can digitize video while you do something else on your computer. Good luck doing that with USB 2.0.
Why aren’t you leading the charge against promoting such a weak alternative? And if you’re really so gung-ho on USB, what steps are you taking to make sure USB supports the kind of cool things Macs should offer, like Target Disk mode.
Now if you take Apple’s logic on this forward, that Apple provides the ports we “should” be using and really need, how come my Macbook Pro doesn’t have the ports that I need? Why are you reducing the number of ports I have on my high-end laptop? Where’s SATA 3.0 port on any new of the new Macs? As a Pro user I have several SATA external drives and this standard is wicked fast, yet I don’t have it. Sure I can drop another $100 on a lunky ExpressCard to add the capability, but that still doesn’t feel right. How about an HDMI-in? An HDMI-out? How about something new and better than all of these that us forward-thinking Apple Pro users “should” be using?
It strikes me that this decision stems from the same type of arrogance that leads Apple to provide updated software for their computers who’s tech notes describe the update as only containing “bug fixes” rather than the actual specific fixes they have done.